(Not my usual spastic self because A. It's a somber book and B. It's a formal book review).
My review can also be found on Goodreads. Link to the book.
Sallah, Michael, and Mitch Weiss. Tiger Force: A True
Story of Men and War. New York, NY: Little, Brown, 2006.
Print.
* * *
Tiger
Force throws no curves; it is a straightforward book that delivers what Michael
Sallah and Mitch Weiss promise to deliver right from the front of the cover.
The “true story of men and war” presents itself in a simplistic, chronological
structure that nevertheless does justice to a highly disturbing story.
The book begins with a prologue
that sets up the after-story of one of the most notorious killers on Tiger
Force (a reconnaissance platoon of the 1st Battalion/327th
Infantry developed for the largely guerilla nature of the Vietnam War)—Sam
Ybarra. In 1975, following the anticlimactic conclusion of the Vietnam War,
Ybarra, an alcoholic suffering from PTSD, is living with his mom on the San
Carlos Indian Reservation. An agent from the CID called Gustav Apsey has
arrived for an interview, but Ybarra turns him away.
Flashback to 1967; the signs of
mental cracking are already beginning to manifest. Replacements fill in for the
two killed and the twenty-five wounded Tigers after the Mother’s Day Massacre.
In addition to Ybarra and his best friend Kenneth Green, the reader is
introduced to the surviving and new members of the platoon. There is
happy-go-lucky surfer Kerrigan, tough-love sergeant Doyle, idealistic medic
Bowman, and many more. Later on, these succinct profiles melt away until only
the killers and the anti-killers remain.
The book is essentially divided into
three phases: The Song Ve Valley, Operation Wheeler, and the post-war
investigation. In the South Ve Valley portion, Tiger Force receives the mission
to relocate villagers living in the fertile, rice paddy, which feeds the Viet
Cong. Despite the many leaflets and the promise of food and shelter at the
relocation camps, the Tigers are met with resistance. By the end of the South
Ve Valley, ten unthreatening farmers are killed; elderly men are beaten until
their brains come out; hamlets are torched; and ears are cut off and collected
for trophies and necklaces. The killings only escalate with Operation Wheeler,
a search and destroy missions during which the entire area of Quang Tin becomes
a free fire zone. The most grotesque of atrocities, one that is repeatedly
underscored during future investigations, is the beheading of a baby by Ybarra.
The third phase of the book, the
investigation, opens in 1972. The reader follows the diligent and relentless
CID agent Gustav Apsey. In order to get the reluctant ex-Tigers to talk, Apsey
faces long hours in the office, numerous flights to track down Tigers who have
scattered to other outposts in the army or to civilian life, and even gunpoint
at the home of an unstable veteran. Then, just as his work comes to fruition,
he is shipped away to Korea. The case is closed. No one receives justice.
For a book of this moderate size,
Tiger Force packs in a hefty blow of information to the gut. It leaves the
reader at once reeling and numb from the sheer amount of information and the
horrid nature of the events described. Its inconclusive ending may drive the
reader to look up more information on Tiger Force. As the book would suggest,
however, an Internet search on Tiger Force turns up an unfortunate dearth of
information. As a result, it is only more incredible that Sallah and Weiss were
able to write in the third person narrative, fleshing out details of events,
backgrounds, and in-the-moment actions.
As expected from Sallah and Weiss,
both of whom received the Pulitzer for their journalism detailing Tiger Force,
the writing is streamlined, frank, and at times, dry. The dryness, however,
serves the story well, for what takes the stage in the book is what happened. Though it brushes on some of the psychology of war
and men, Tiger Force is not by any means a book unraveling the beauty of life
and the ugliness of war. Any flowery language would detract from its mission: why
did the atrocities happen? Why did nobody stop them?
However,
in asking the question why? Sallah and
Weiss flaunt the weakest point in the book.
While an empathy link between the
reader and the soldier in any book of war is incredibly difficult—even
foolish—to establish (after all, no amount of living vicariously through words
will truly recreate that fine tightrope between life and death), sympathy
toward men of war can and has been
achieved in other war books. Tiger Force, however, vacillates between
portraying the Tigers as men who committed the atrocities because they were
frayed to the quick and men who committed atrocities because a factor in their
psyches and backgrounds made them susceptible to becoming bloodthirsty, twisted
killers who beheaded babies. At times, Sallah and Weiss seemed to favor the
latter explanation, tossing out hypotheses not limited to abusive parents and
rocky childhoods. In addition, the clear distinction made between Tiger Force’s
story and My Lai’s make it harder for the reader to attribute the killings to
“madness” brought about by weeks of being picked off by snipers and booby-traps
(which seemed to be the favored explanation in the beginning). In particular,
the reader may be confused as to how to view Sam Ybarra. His post-war days are
tragic, flooded with alcohol, nightmares, and guilt, but Sallah and Weiss do
not expand that into point about personal punishment versus punishment by
justice.
The problem with Tiger Force is
that it is minimally biased in details, word choice, and tone. That is all very
well—for journalism. Tiger Force, however, is not journalism. As a book, it should
be doing more than to inform; it should offer a unique perspective from the
authors themselves on the subject matter. The problem with Tiger Force is that
it suspiciously resembles a collage of news articles from the authors’ work in
the Toledo Blade’s Tiger Force series.
Thus, the praise of Edward Nawokta
serves as a double-edged sword:
“Tiger Force is a shining
example of how journalism can fulfill its most noble aims: informing and,
consequently, empowering the public.”
Perhaps the point of the authors is
there is no answer to the why.
Perhaps the point of the authors is
that it all happened. And not a thing was done about it.
No comments:
Post a Comment